Demographics details for Springville, UT vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springville, UT vs Parker, SD.
| Data | Springville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,832 | 1,221 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $84,699 | $83,864 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Springville vs Parker
- In Springville, the population is higher at 35,832, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 26.9 years in Springville.
- Springville has a higher median income of $84,699 compared to $83,864 in Parker.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springville at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is identical in both Springville and Parker at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Springville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Springville vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 78 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Springville vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Springville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 78% in Springville.
- The Asian population is larger in Springville at 1% compared to 0% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springville at 16% compared to 5% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springville at 5% compared to 4% in Parker.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Springville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.2% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springville vs Parker
- More residents in Springville report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springville at 23.8% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 7.5% in Springville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 8.2% in Springville.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 30.9% in Springville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springville at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (141) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (3,312) | 17.9% (218) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (1,867) | 13.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (7,419) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springville vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Springville have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 9.2% in Springville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 13.0%, compared to 5.2% in Springville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.