Demographics details for Springville, UT vs Findlay, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springville, UT vs Findlay, OH.
| Data | Springville | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,832 | 40,249 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $84,699 | $54,986 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Springville vs Findlay
- The population in Findlay is higher at 40,249, compared to 35,832 in Springville.
- The median age in Findlay is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 26.9 years in Springville.
- Springville has a higher median income of $84,699 compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springville at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Findlay.
- The poverty level is higher in Findlay at 10%, compared to 5% in Springville.
- Findlay has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in Springville.
Demographics
Demographics Springville vs Findlay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springville | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 78 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springville vs Findlay
- In Findlay, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Springville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Findlay at 83% compared to 78% in Springville.
- In Findlay, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Springville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springville at 16% compared to 8% in Findlay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springville at 5% compared to 4% in Findlay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springville and Findlay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springville | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.2% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springville vs Findlay
- In Findlay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.9% in Springville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springville at 23.8% compared to 22.5% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 7.5% in Springville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 8.2% in Springville.
- Findlay has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 30.9% in Springville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Findlay at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Springville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springville | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (141) | 0.3% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (3,312) | 21.2% (8,536) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (1,867) | 9.9% (4,003) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (7,419) | 19.6% (7,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springville vs Findlay
- A higher percentage of residents in Springville have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Findlay.
- In Findlay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 9.2% in Springville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Findlay at 9.9%, compared to 5.2% in Springville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 19.6% in Findlay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.