Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Washburn, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Washburn, WI.
| Data | Springhill | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,575 | 16,911 |
| Median Age | 46.1 years | 52.2 years |
| Median Income | $27,868 | $58,504 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Springhill vs Washburn
- The population in Washburn is higher at 16,911, compared to 4,575 in Springhill.
- The median age in Washburn is higher at 52.2 years, compared to 46.1 years in Springhill.
- Washburn has a higher median income of $58,504, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- In Washburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Washburn.
- The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Washburn.
Demographics
Demographics Springhill vs Washburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springhill | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Washburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springhill at 34% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washburn at 92% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- In Washburn, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Springhill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springhill at 8% compared to 2% in Washburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washburn at 3%, compared to 2% in Springhill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springhill and Washburn at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springhill | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.7% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.7% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 31.4% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Washburn
- More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 15.7% in Washburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 24.3% in Washburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 17.4% in Washburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 15.2% in Springhill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 34.0% in Washburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Washburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springhill | Washburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (104) | 0.7% (115) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,028) | 22.9% (3,881) |
| Less than High School | 24.5% (1,122) | 9.6% (1,628) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (277) | 17.2% (2,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Washburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.7% in Washburn.
- In Washburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.9% compared to 22.5% in Springhill.
- More residents in Springhill have less than a high school education at 24.5% compared to 9.6% in Washburn.
- In Washburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.