Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Union springs, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Union springs, AL.

Data Springhill Union springs
Population 4,575 3,242
Median Age 46.1 years 28.1 years
Median Income $27,868 $24,921
Married Families 34.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 20% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Springhill vs Union springs

  • In Springhill, the population is higher at 4,575, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
  • Residents in Springhill have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Springhill has a higher median income of $27,868 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Springhill at 34.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 20% in Springhill.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Springhill and Union springs at 5.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Springhill vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Springhill Union springs
Black 34 69
White 55 4
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 8 22
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 34% in Springhill.
  • Springhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • In Union springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Springhill.
  • Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 8% in Springhill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union springs at 4%, compared to 2% in Springhill.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springhill at 1% compared to 0% in Union springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Springhill Union springs
Mental Health Not Good 23.7% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 18.7% 16.9%
Depression 29.9% 20.8%
Smoking 31.4% 25.5%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 11.1%
Obesity 45.4% 49.5%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Union springs

  • More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 21.3% in Union springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 25.5% in Union springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 45.4% in Springhill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Union springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Springhill Union springs
No Schooling 2.3% (104) 3.6% (117)
High School Diploma 22.5% (1,028) 15.1% (489)
Less than High School 24.5% (1,122) 33.7% (1,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.1% (277) 7.3% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.3% in Springhill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 24.5% in Springhill.
  • In Union springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.