Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Martinsdale, MT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Martinsdale, MT.

Data Springhill Martinsdale
Population 4,575 37
Median Age 46.1 years 40.8 years
Median Income $27,868 $55,489
Married Families 34.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 20% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Springhill vs Martinsdale

  • In Springhill, the population is higher at 4,575, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
  • Residents in Springhill have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 40.8 years in Martinsdale.
  • Martinsdale has a higher median income of $55,489, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Springhill at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Martinsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Springhill vs Martinsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Springhill Martinsdale
Black 34 Data is updating
White 55 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springhill at 34% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Martinsdale at 100% compared to 55% in Springhill.
  • Both Springhill and Martinsdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Springhill at 8% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Springhill at 2% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springhill at 1% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Springhill Martinsdale
Mental Health Not Good 23.7% 12.2%
Physical Health Not Good 18.7% 14.4%
Depression 29.9% 20.1%
Smoking 31.4% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 14.5%
Obesity 45.4% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Martinsdale

  • More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 20.1% in Martinsdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Springhill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Springhill Martinsdale
No Schooling 2.3% (104) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.5% (1,028) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 24.5% (1,122) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.1% (277) 81.1% (30)

Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Springhill have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents in Springhill have less than a high school education at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • In Martinsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.