Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Springhill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,575 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 46.1 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $27,868 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Springhill vs Hopkins
- In Springhill, the population is higher at 4,575, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 46.1 years in Springhill.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springhill at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Springhill vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springhill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 83 |
| White | 55 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 34% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- Both Springhill and Hopkins have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springhill at 8% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springhill at 2% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springhill at 1% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springhill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 31.4% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Hopkins
- More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 19.5% in Hopkins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 21.3% in Hopkins.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Springhill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 44.2% in Hopkins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 21.0% in Springhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springhill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (104) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,028) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 24.5% (1,122) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (277) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 20.8% in Hopkins.
- More residents in Springhill have less than a high school education at 24.5% compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.