Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Cottonwood, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Cottonwood, AL.
| Data | Springhill | Cottonwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,575 | 1,057 |
| Median Age | 46.1 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $27,868 | $31,591 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Springhill vs Cottonwood
- In Springhill, the population is higher at 4,575, compared to 1,057 in Cottonwood.
- Residents in Springhill have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 44.5 years in Cottonwood.
- Cottonwood has a higher median income of $31,591, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- In Cottonwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Cottonwood.
- The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Cottonwood.
Demographics
Demographics Springhill vs Cottonwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springhill | Cottonwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 37 |
| White | 55 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Cottonwood
- In Cottonwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 34% in Springhill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cottonwood at 57% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- Both Springhill and Cottonwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springhill at 8% compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cottonwood at 4%, compared to 2% in Springhill.
- In Cottonwood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Springhill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springhill | Cottonwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.7% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.7% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 31.4% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Cottonwood
- More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 20.4% in Cottonwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 26.3% in Cottonwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 22.7% in Cottonwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 14.5% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 40.8% in Cottonwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Cottonwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springhill | Cottonwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (104) | 3.4% (36) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,028) | 29.8% (315) |
| Less than High School | 24.5% (1,122) | 28.8% (304) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (277) | 9.2% (97) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Cottonwood
- In Cottonwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 2.3% in Springhill.
- In Cottonwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 22.5% in Springhill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cottonwood at 28.8%, compared to 24.5% in Springhill.
- In Cottonwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.