Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Springhill | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,575 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 46.1 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $27,868 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Springhill vs Cherokee
- The population in Cherokee is higher at 48,098, compared to 4,575 in Springhill.
- Residents in Springhill have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has a higher median income of $52,410, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 15% in Cherokee.
- The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.6% in Cherokee.
Demographics
Demographics Springhill vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springhill | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springhill at 34% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Springhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Springhill.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Springhill and Cherokee at 8%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 2% in Springhill.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 1% in Springhill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springhill | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.7% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 31.4% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Cherokee
- More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 20.2% in Cherokee.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 26.6% in Cherokee.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 23.2% in Cherokee.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 43.7% in Cherokee.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Cherokee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springhill | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (104) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,028) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 24.5% (1,122) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (277) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.9% in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 15.6% in Cherokee.
- More residents in Springhill have less than a high school education at 24.5% compared to 11.5% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.