Demographics details for Springhill, LA vs Chana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springhill, LA vs Chana, IL.
Data | Springhill | Chana |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,575 | 235 |
Median Age | 46.1 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $27,868 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 70.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Springhill vs Chana
- In Springhill, the population is higher at 4,575, compared to 235 in Chana.
- Residents in Springhill have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 38.0 years in Chana.
- Chana has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- In Chana, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 5% in Chana.
- The unemployment rate in Springhill is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Chana.
Demographics
Demographics Springhill vs Chana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springhill | Chana |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | Data is updating |
White | 55 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springhill vs Chana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springhill at 34% compared to 0% in Chana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chana at 100% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- Both Springhill and Chana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springhill at 8% compared to 0% in Chana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springhill at 2% compared to 0% in Chana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springhill at 1% compared to 0% in Chana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springhill | Chana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 23.7% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 29.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 31.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 45.4% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springhill vs Chana
- More residents in Springhill report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springhill at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springhill at 31.4% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springhill at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springhill at 45.4% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springhill | Chana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.3% (104) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (1,028) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 24.5% (1,122) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (277) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springhill vs Chana
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- More residents in Springhill have less than a high school education at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springhill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.1% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.