Demographics details for Springfield, OR vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, OR vs Lancaster, VA.
Data | Springfield | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Population | 61,400 | 10,750 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 59.2 years |
Median Income | $60,982 | $62,674 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Lancaster
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 61,400, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 37.3 years in Springfield.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $62,674, compared to $60,982 in Springfield.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 36.0% in Springfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Springfield and Lancaster at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 28 |
White | 73 | 66 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Springfield at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springfield at 14% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springfield at 9% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springfield at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.6% |
Depression | 28.9% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Lancaster
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 28.9% compared to 22.2% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springfield at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.4% in Springfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springfield at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (528) | 1.5% (164) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (9,128) | 20.9% (2,244) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (8,821) | 17.0% (1,823) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (8,749) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Springfield.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 14.9% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 14.4% in Springfield.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 14.2% in Springfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.