Demographics details for Springfield, OR vs Aurora, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, OR vs Aurora, CO.
Data | Springfield | Aurora |
---|---|---|
Population | 61,400 | 393,537 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $60,982 | $78,685 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Aurora
- The population in Aurora is higher at 393,537, compared to 61,400 in Springfield.
- Residents in Springfield have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Aurora.
- Aurora has a higher median income of $78,685, compared to $60,982 in Springfield.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Springfield and Aurora at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Aurora at 11%, compared to 10% in Springfield.
- Aurora has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Springfield.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Aurora provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Aurora |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 16 |
White | 73 | 35 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 14 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Aurora
- In Aurora, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 35% in Aurora.
- In Aurora, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Springfield.
- Aurora has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 14% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aurora at 13%, compared to 9% in Springfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springfield and Aurora at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Aurora |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.8% |
Depression | 28.9% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Aurora
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.6% in Aurora.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 28.9% compared to 20.4% in Aurora.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Aurora.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Aurora at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Springfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 36.4% compared to 28.2% in Aurora.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springfield at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Aurora.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Aurora |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (528) | 1.8% (7,109) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (9,128) | 13.0% (51,046) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (8,821) | 14.8% (58,325) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (8,749) | 20.8% (81,674) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Aurora
- In Aurora, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 13.0% in Aurora.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aurora at 14.8%, compared to 14.4% in Springfield.
- In Aurora, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 14.2% in Springfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.