Demographics details for Springfield, MA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, MA vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Springfield | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 154,064 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $47,677 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Spanish fork
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 154,064, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- Residents in Springfield have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 1 |
White | 8 | 80 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 49 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springfield at 21% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 8% in Springfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Springfield at 3% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springfield at 49% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springfield at 19% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springfield and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 10.8% |
Depression | 25.8% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 25.8% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 19.9% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springfield at 14.3% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 40.8% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,005) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (25,679) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 23.8% (36,663) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (19,500) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Springfield have less than a high school education at 23.8% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 12.7% in Springfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.