Demographics details for Springfield, MA vs Paulden, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, MA vs Paulden, AZ.
Data | Springfield | Paulden |
---|---|---|
Population | 154,064 | 4,518 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 49.5 years |
Median Income | $47,677 | $65,417 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Paulden
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 154,064, compared to 4,518 in Paulden.
- The median age in Paulden is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
- Paulden has a higher median income of $65,417, compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
- In Paulden, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Paulden.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.5% in Paulden.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Paulden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Paulden |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | Data is updating |
White | 8 | 70 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 49 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Paulden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springfield at 21% compared to 0% in Paulden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paulden at 70% compared to 8% in Springfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Springfield at 3% compared to 1% in Paulden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springfield at 49% compared to 24% in Paulden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springfield at 19% compared to 4% in Paulden.
- In Paulden, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Springfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Paulden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.9% |
Depression | 25.8% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 29.4% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Paulden
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 19.0% in Paulden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 25.8% compared to 22.8% in Paulden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 19.9% compared to 19.7% in Paulden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Paulden at 16.3% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 40.8% compared to 29.4% in Paulden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Paulden at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Springfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Paulden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (3,005) | 2.1% (94) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (25,679) | 22.8% (1,032) |
Less than High School | 23.8% (36,663) | 17.7% (798) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (19,500) | 10.2% (461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Paulden
- In Paulden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 2.0% in Springfield.
- In Paulden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 16.7% in Springfield.
- More residents in Springfield have less than a high school education at 23.8% compared to 17.7% in Paulden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 10.2% in Paulden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.