Demographics details for Springfield, MA vs Panaca, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, MA vs Panaca, NV.
| Data | Springfield | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,064 | 1,039 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $47,677 | $68,073 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Panaca
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 154,064, compared to 1,039 in Panaca.
- The median age in Panaca is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
- Panaca has a higher median income of $68,073, compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
- In Panaca, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Panaca.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 6.9%, compared to 4.5% in Panaca.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Panaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springfield | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | Data is updating |
| White | 8 | 92 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 49 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Panaca
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springfield at 21% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panaca at 92% compared to 8% in Springfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Springfield at 3% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springfield at 49% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springfield at 19% compared to 3% in Panaca.
- In Panaca, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Springfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springfield | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Panaca
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 18.1% in Panaca.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 25.8% compared to 22.8% in Panaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Panaca.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panaca at 18.2% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 40.8% compared to 33.4% in Panaca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 6.0% in Panaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springfield | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (3,005) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (25,679) | 20.0% (208) |
| Less than High School | 23.8% (36,663) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (19,500) | 16.3% (169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Panaca
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- In Panaca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Springfield.
- More residents in Springfield have less than a high school education at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- In Panaca, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 12.7% in Springfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.