Demographics details for Springfield, IL vs Sanger, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, IL vs Sanger, CA.
Data | Springfield | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Population | 113,273 | 26,600 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 31.8 years |
Median Income | $62,419 | $69,333 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Sanger
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 113,273, compared to 26,600 in Sanger.
- Residents in Springfield have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher median income of $69,333, compared to $62,419 in Springfield.
- In Sanger, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Springfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanger at 16%, compared to 12% in Springfield.
- Sanger has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 5.8% in Springfield.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Sanger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | Data is updating |
White | 69 | 3 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 3 | 77 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Sanger
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springfield at 20% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- Both Springfield and Sanger have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Sanger has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 77%, compared to 3% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanger at 15%, compared to 5% in Springfield.
- In Sanger, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Springfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 14.7% |
Depression | 21.5% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Sanger
- In Sanger, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.3% in Springfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 21.5% compared to 17.2% in Sanger.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Sanger.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springfield at 17.4% compared to 13.8% in Sanger.
- Sanger has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 36.1% in Springfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springfield at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanger.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Sanger |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (542) | 2.9% (768) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (18,528) | 13.5% (3,599) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (10,102) | 32.2% (8,575) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (27,677) | 7.8% (2,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Sanger
- In Sanger, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.5% in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 13.5% in Sanger.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanger at 32.2%, compared to 8.9% in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 7.8% in Sanger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.