Demographics details for Springdale, AR vs Mccomb, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springdale, AR vs Mccomb, MS.
Data | Springdale | Mccomb |
---|---|---|
Population | 87,672 | 12,041 |
Median Age | 32.1 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $59,985 | $37,288 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Springdale vs Mccomb
- In Springdale, the population is higher at 87,672, compared to 12,041 in Mccomb.
- The median age in Mccomb is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 32.1 years in Springdale.
- Springdale has a higher median income of $59,985 compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springdale at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccomb at 22%, compared to 10% in Springdale.
- Mccomb has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 2.7% in Springdale.
Demographics
Demographics Springdale vs Mccomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springdale | Mccomb |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 75 |
White | 36 | 22 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 38 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springdale vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 75% compared to 3% in Springdale.
- Springdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- The Asian population is larger in Springdale at 3% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Springdale at 38% compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springdale at 19% compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Springdale at 1% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springdale | Mccomb |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.2% |
Depression | 25.2% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 25.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 10.8% |
Obesity | 35.5% | 48.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springdale vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.0% in Springdale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springdale at 25.2% compared to 24.3% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 20.4% in Springdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springdale at 14.2% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has higher obesity rates at 48.5% compared to 35.5% in Springdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Springdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springdale | Mccomb |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (2,317) | 0.7% (81) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (12,683) | 22.1% (2,666) |
Less than High School | 26.6% (23,284) | 11.2% (1,349) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.0% (12,306) | 12.1% (1,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springdale vs Mccomb
- A higher percentage of residents in Springdale have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Mccomb.
- In Mccomb, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 14.5% in Springdale.
- More residents in Springdale have less than a high school education at 26.6% compared to 11.2% in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 12.1% in Mccomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.