Demographics details for Springboro, OH vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springboro, OH vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Springboro | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,427 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $113,182 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Springboro vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 19,427 in Springboro.
- Residents in Springboro have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Springboro has a higher median income of $113,182 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springboro at 50.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Springboro.
Demographics
Demographics Springboro vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springboro | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 11 |
| White | 89 | 53 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Springboro vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in Springboro.
- Springboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Springboro.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 4% in Springboro.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Springboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springboro | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springboro vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Springboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 21.1% in Springboro.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 12.7% in Springboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springboro at 20.0% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 34.4% in Springboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Springboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springboro | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (2,072) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (539) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (6,871) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springboro vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Springboro.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 10.7% in Springboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 2.8% in Springboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.