Demographics details for Springboro, OH vs Port gibson, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Springboro, OH vs Port gibson, MS.

Data Springboro Port gibson
Population 19,427 1,206
Median Age 37.7 years 47.3 years
Median Income $113,182 $24,773
Married Families 50.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 3% 30%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.3

Population Comparison: Springboro vs Port gibson

  • In Springboro, the population is higher at 19,427, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
  • The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 37.7 years in Springboro.
  • Springboro has a higher median income of $113,182 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Springboro at 50.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
  • Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in Springboro.

Demographics

Demographics Springboro vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Springboro Port gibson
Black 2 82
White 89 12
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Springboro vs Port gibson

  • In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 2% in Springboro.
  • Springboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Springboro at 2% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Springboro at 3% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 4% in Springboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springboro and Port gibson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Springboro Port gibson
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 16.0%
Depression 21.1% 20.0%
Smoking 12.7% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 20.0% 10.2%
Obesity 34.4% 50.5%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Springboro vs Port gibson

  • In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.2% in Springboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Springboro at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 12.7% in Springboro.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Springboro at 20.0% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 34.4% in Springboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Springboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Springboro Port gibson
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (6)
High School Diploma 10.7% (2,072) 9.8% (118)
Less than High School 2.8% (539) 13.3% (160)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.4% (6,871) 21.2% (256)

Education Levels Comparison: Springboro vs Port gibson

  • In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Springboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port gibson at 13.3%, compared to 2.8% in Springboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.