Demographics details for Springboro, OH vs Fort mill, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springboro, OH vs Fort mill, SC.
| Data | Springboro | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,427 | 30,940 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $113,182 | $128,125 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Springboro vs Fort mill
- The population in Fort mill is higher at 30,940, compared to 19,427 in Springboro.
- Residents in Springboro have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125, compared to $113,182 in Springboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springboro at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort mill at 5%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- Fort mill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Springboro.
Demographics
Demographics Springboro vs Fort mill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springboro | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 89 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springboro vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Springboro.
- Springboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 79% in Fort mill.
- In Fort mill, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Springboro.
- Fort mill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- Both Springboro and Fort mill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springboro and Fort mill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springboro | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springboro vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.2% in Springboro.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 21.1%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springboro at 12.7% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springboro at 20.0% compared to 18.3% in Fort mill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springboro at 34.4% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Springboro at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springboro | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (2,072) | 7.7% (2,372) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (539) | 2.8% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (6,871) | 30.0% (9,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springboro vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Springboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 2.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 30.0% in Fort mill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.