Demographics details for Springboro, OH vs Ashburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springboro, OH vs Ashburn, GA.
| Data | Springboro | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,427 | 4,174 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $113,182 | $35,987 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Springboro vs Ashburn
- In Springboro, the population is higher at 19,427, compared to 4,174 in Ashburn.
- The median age in Ashburn is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.7 years in Springboro.
- Springboro has a higher median income of $113,182 compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Springboro at 50.0% compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashburn at 12%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- Ashburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Springboro.
Demographics
Demographics Springboro vs Ashburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Springboro | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 71 |
| White | 89 | 22 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springboro vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 2% in Springboro.
- Springboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Springboro at 2% compared to 0% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Springboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Springboro at 4% compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springboro and Ashburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Springboro | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springboro vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.2% in Springboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashburn at 21.2% versus 21.1% in Springboro.
- Ashburn has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 12.7% in Springboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Springboro at 20.0% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 34.4% in Springboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Springboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Springboro | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (2,072) | 19.0% (791) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (539) | 21.0% (875) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (6,871) | 7.3% (304) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springboro vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Springboro.
- In Ashburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 10.7% in Springboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashburn at 21.0%, compared to 2.8% in Springboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.