Demographics details for Spring park, MN vs Ozark, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spring park, MN vs Ozark, AL.
| Data | Spring park | Ozark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,663 | 14,299 |
| Median Age | 55.5 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $48,684 | $47,407 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Spring park vs Ozark
- The population in Ozark is higher at 14,299, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
- Residents in Spring park have a higher median age of 55.5 years compared to 40.9 years in Ozark.
- Spring park has a higher median income of $48,684 compared to $47,407 in Ozark.
- In Ozark, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
- The poverty level is higher in Ozark at 15%, compared to 5% in Spring park.
- Ozark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Spring park.
Demographics
Demographics Spring park vs Ozark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spring park | Ozark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 30 |
| White | 82 | 57 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Spring park vs Ozark
- In Ozark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 9% in Spring park.
- Spring park has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 57% in Ozark.
- Both Spring park and Ozark have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Ozark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Spring park.
- Both Spring park and Ozark have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Spring park at 3% compared to 1% in Ozark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spring park | Ozark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 26.0% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spring park vs Ozark
- In Ozark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 13.4% in Spring park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Spring park at 23.7% compared to 23.6% in Ozark.
- Ozark has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 11.7% in Spring park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 14.7% in Ozark.
- Ozark has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ozark at 23.0% compared to 22.0% in Spring park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spring park | Ozark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (9) | 1.9% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 27.8% (463) | 15.7% (2,251) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (200) | 16.1% (2,307) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.1% (484) | 12.8% (1,831) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spring park vs Ozark
- In Ozark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.5% in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spring park hold a high school diploma at 27.8% compared to 15.7% in Ozark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ozark at 16.1%, compared to 12.0% in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spring park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.1% compared to 12.8% in Ozark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.