Demographics details for Spring park, MN vs Colquitt, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spring park, MN vs Colquitt, GA.
| Data | Spring park | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,663 | 45,762 |
| Median Age | 55.5 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,684 | $47,235 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Spring park vs Colquitt
- The population in Colquitt is higher at 45,762, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
- Residents in Spring park have a higher median age of 55.5 years compared to 37.1 years in Colquitt.
- Spring park has a higher median income of $48,684 compared to $47,235 in Colquitt.
- In Colquitt, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
- The poverty level is higher in Colquitt at 22%, compared to 5% in Spring park.
- Colquitt has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Spring park.
Demographics
Demographics Spring park vs Colquitt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spring park | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 23 |
| White | 82 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Spring park vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 9% in Spring park.
- Spring park has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 51% in Colquitt.
- The Asian population is larger in Spring park at 2% compared to 1% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 1% in Spring park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colquitt at 4%, compared to 3% in Spring park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Spring park at 3% compared to 1% in Colquitt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spring park | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 22.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.5% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 26.0% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spring park vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.4% in Spring park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Spring park at 23.7% compared to 22.4% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 11.7% in Spring park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 13.7% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Colquitt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spring park | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (9) | 1.5% (678) |
| High School Diploma | 27.8% (463) | 20.2% (9,244) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (200) | 26.2% (12,009) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.1% (484) | 9.6% (4,394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spring park vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spring park hold a high school diploma at 27.8% compared to 20.2% in Colquitt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colquitt at 26.2%, compared to 12.0% in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spring park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.1% compared to 9.6% in Colquitt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.