Demographics details for Spring glen, PA vs Laurel, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spring glen, PA vs Laurel, MS.

Data Spring glen Laurel
Population 500 17,066
Median Age 35.0 years 37.6 years
Median Income $50,000 $36,336
Married Families 40.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.4

Population Comparison: Spring glen vs Laurel

  • The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 500 in Spring glen.
  • The median age in Laurel is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 35.0 years in Spring glen.
  • Spring glen has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spring glen at 40.0% compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
  • The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 10% in Spring glen.
  • Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.0% in Spring glen.

Demographics

Demographics Spring glen vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spring glen Laurel
Black 2 66
White 95 28
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 4
Two or More Races 1 1
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Spring glen vs Laurel

  • In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 2% in Spring glen.
  • Spring glen has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 28% in Laurel.
  • The Asian population is larger in Spring glen at 1% compared to 0% in Laurel.
  • Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Spring glen.
  • Both Spring glen and Laurel have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
  • In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Spring glen.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spring glen Laurel
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.9%
Depression Data is updating% 21.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 11.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spring glen vs Laurel

  • In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 21.8% versus 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spring glen Laurel
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (124)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.3% (2,956)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.5% (2,979)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.6% (2,485)

Education Levels Comparison: Spring glen vs Laurel

  • In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.
  • In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Spring glen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.