Demographics details for Spokane valley, WA vs Pequot lakes, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spokane valley, WA vs Pequot lakes, MN.

Data Spokane valley Pequot lakes
Population 107,325 2,440
Median Age 37.4 years 40.5 years
Median Income $66,483 $73,125
Married Families 37.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Spokane valley vs Pequot lakes

  • In Spokane valley, the population is higher at 107,325, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
  • The median age in Pequot lakes is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.4 years in Spokane valley.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125, compared to $66,483 in Spokane valley.
  • In Pequot lakes, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
  • The unemployment rate in Spokane valley is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Spokane valley vs Pequot lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spokane valley Pequot lakes
Black 1 1
White 82 94
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 7 1
Two or More Races 7 2
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Pequot lakes

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Spokane valley and Pequot lakes at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pequot lakes at 94% compared to 82% in Spokane valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Spokane valley at 2% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spokane valley and Pequot lakes at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spokane valley Pequot lakes
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 8.5%
Depression 28.7% 23.3%
Smoking 15.3% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 19.4%
Obesity 29.7% 30.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Pequot lakes

  • More residents in Spokane valley report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 28.7% compared to 23.3% in Pequot lakes.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 18.5% in Spokane valley.
  • Pequot lakes has higher obesity rates at 30.3% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spokane valley Pequot lakes
No Schooling 0.6% (596) 0.7% (17)
High School Diploma 15.6% (16,779) 14.0% (341)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,741) 3.4% (84)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (18,346) 20.7% (504)

Education Levels Comparison: Spokane valley vs Pequot lakes

  • In Pequot lakes, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Spokane valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents in Spokane valley have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • In Pequot lakes, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 17.1% in Spokane valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.