Demographics details for Spokane valley, WA vs Montour, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spokane valley, WA vs Montour, IA.
| Data | Spokane valley | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,325 | 199 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $66,483 | $73,750 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Spokane valley vs Montour
- In Spokane valley, the population is higher at 107,325, compared to 199 in Montour.
- The median age in Montour is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 37.4 years in Spokane valley.
- Montour has a higher median income of $73,750, compared to $66,483 in Spokane valley.
- In Montour, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 37.0% in Spokane valley.
- Spokane valley has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Montour.
- The unemployment rate in Spokane valley is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.1% in Montour.
Demographics
Demographics Spokane valley vs Montour provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spokane valley | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 82 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Montour
- In Montour, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
- Spokane valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 76% in Montour.
- The Asian population is larger in Spokane valley at 2% compared to 0% in Montour.
- Montour has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Spokane valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 6% in Montour.
- In Montour, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spokane valley | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 21.3% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Montour
- More residents in Spokane valley report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Montour.
- Depression is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 28.7% compared to 19.5% in Montour.
- Montour has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 15.3% in Spokane valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Montour at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Spokane valley.
- Montour has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Montour.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spokane valley | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (596) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (16,779) | 29.1% (58) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (7,741) | 25.1% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (18,346) | 15.6% (31) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spokane valley vs Montour
- A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Montour.
- In Montour, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.1% compared to 15.6% in Spokane valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Montour at 25.1%, compared to 7.2% in Spokane valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Montour.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.