Demographics details for Spokane valley, WA vs Farmington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spokane valley, WA vs Farmington, CT.

Data Spokane valley Farmington
Population 107,325 25,340
Median Age 37.4 years 42.0 years
Median Income $66,483 $101,000
Married Families 37.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 10% 3%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 2.0

Population Comparison: Spokane valley vs Farmington

  • In Spokane valley, the population is higher at 107,325, compared to 25,340 in Farmington.
  • The median age in Farmington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Spokane valley.
  • Farmington has a higher median income of $101,000, compared to $66,483 in Spokane valley.
  • In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 37.0% in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 3% in Farmington.
  • The unemployment rate in Spokane valley is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.0% in Farmington.

Demographics

Demographics Spokane valley vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spokane valley Farmington
Black 1 5
White 82 85
Asian 2 5
Hispanic 7 5
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 82% in Spokane valley.
  • In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Spokane valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Spokane valley at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spokane valley Farmington
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% Data is updating%
Depression 28.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 29.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 16.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Farmington

  • More residents in Spokane valley report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 28.7% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Spokane valley at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Spokane valley at 29.7% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spokane valley Farmington
No Schooling 0.6% (596) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.6% (16,779) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,741) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (18,346) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Spokane valley vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • More residents in Spokane valley have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.