Demographics details for Spokane valley, WA vs Concordia, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spokane valley, WA vs Concordia, KS.

Data Spokane valley Concordia
Population 107,325 5,054
Median Age 37.4 years 36.3 years
Median Income $66,483 $45,000
Married Families 37.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.0

Population Comparison: Spokane valley vs Concordia

  • In Spokane valley, the population is higher at 107,325, compared to 5,054 in Concordia.
  • Residents in Spokane valley have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.3 years in Concordia.
  • Spokane valley has a higher median income of $66,483 compared to $45,000 in Concordia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spokane valley at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Concordia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Concordia at 13%, compared to 10% in Spokane valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Spokane valley is higher at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Concordia.

Demographics

Demographics Spokane valley vs Concordia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spokane valley Concordia
Black 1 2
White 82 87
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Concordia

  • In Concordia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Concordia at 87% compared to 82% in Spokane valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Spokane valley at 2% compared to 0% in Concordia.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Spokane valley and Concordia at 7%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 4% in Concordia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Spokane valley at 1% compared to 0% in Concordia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spokane valley Concordia
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 11.1%
Depression 28.7% 21.9%
Smoking 15.3% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 19.3%
Obesity 29.7% 37.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Concordia

  • More residents in Spokane valley report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.2% in Concordia.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 28.7% compared to 21.9% in Concordia.
  • Concordia has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 15.3% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Concordia at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Spokane valley.
  • Concordia has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Concordia.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spokane valley Concordia
No Schooling 0.6% (596) 0.5% (26)
High School Diploma 15.6% (16,779) 19.4% (983)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,741) 6.4% (324)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (18,346) 13.6% (688)

Education Levels Comparison: Spokane valley vs Concordia

  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Concordia.
  • In Concordia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 15.6% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents in Spokane valley have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 6.4% in Concordia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 13.6% in Concordia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.