Demographics details for Spokane valley, WA vs Cincinnati, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spokane valley, WA vs Cincinnati, OH.

Data Spokane valley Cincinnati
Population 107,325 309,513
Median Age 37.4 years 32.9 years
Median Income $66,483 $49,191
Married Families 37.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 10% 17%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 5.8

Population Comparison: Spokane valley vs Cincinnati

  • The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 107,325 in Spokane valley.
  • Residents in Spokane valley have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
  • Spokane valley has a higher median income of $66,483 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spokane valley at 37.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 10% in Spokane valley.
  • Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.1% in Spokane valley.

Demographics

Demographics Spokane valley vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spokane valley Cincinnati
Black 1 40
White 82 46
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 7 5
Two or More Races 7 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Cincinnati

  • In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
  • In Cincinnati, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Spokane valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spokane valley at 7% compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Spokane valley at 1% compared to 0% in Cincinnati.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spokane valley Cincinnati
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 13.1%
Depression 28.7% 21.6%
Smoking 15.3% 21.3%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 18.2%
Obesity 29.7% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spokane valley vs Cincinnati

  • More residents in Spokane valley report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Cincinnati.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spokane valley at 28.7% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
  • Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 15.3% in Spokane valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Spokane valley at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Cincinnati.
  • Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Cincinnati.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spokane valley Cincinnati
No Schooling 0.6% (596) 0.9% (2,632)
High School Diploma 15.6% (16,779) 12.5% (38,643)
Less than High School 7.2% (7,741) 9.6% (29,753)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (18,346) 26.4% (81,592)

Education Levels Comparison: Spokane valley vs Cincinnati

  • In Cincinnati, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Spokane valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spokane valley hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cincinnati at 9.6%, compared to 7.2% in Spokane valley.
  • In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 17.1% in Spokane valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.