Demographics details for Spartanburg, SC vs Wasilla, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spartanburg, SC vs Wasilla, AK.
| Data | Spartanburg | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,584 | 9,711 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,140 | $69,534 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Spartanburg vs Wasilla
- In Spartanburg, the population is higher at 38,584, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
- The median age in Wasilla is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
- Wasilla has a higher median income of $69,534, compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
- In Wasilla, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
- Spartanburg has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- The unemployment rate in Spartanburg is higher at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics Spartanburg vs Wasilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spartanburg | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 1 |
| White | 44 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Spartanburg at 45% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wasilla at 74% compared to 44% in Spartanburg.
- In Wasilla, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Spartanburg.
- Wasilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Spartanburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wasilla at 9%, compared to 4% in Spartanburg.
- In Wasilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Spartanburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spartanburg | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Wasilla
- More residents in Spartanburg report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Wasilla.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wasilla at 23.2% versus 22.9% in Spartanburg.
- Wasilla has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Spartanburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wasilla at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Spartanburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Spartanburg at 38.5% compared to 35.8% in Wasilla.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Spartanburg and Wasilla at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spartanburg | Wasilla |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (384) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,118) | 21.1% (2,051) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (4,339) | 5.3% (514) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (8,205) | 13.3% (1,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spartanburg vs Wasilla
- A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- In Wasilla, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 15.9% in Spartanburg.
- More residents in Spartanburg have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.