Demographics details for Spartanburg, SC vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spartanburg, SC vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Spartanburg Fort valley
Population 38,584 8,838
Median Age 35.5 years 30.6 years
Median Income $49,140 $31,807
Married Families 28.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 15% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fort valley

  • In Spartanburg, the population is higher at 38,584, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
  • Residents in Spartanburg have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Spartanburg has a higher median income of $49,140 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spartanburg at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 15% in Spartanburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Spartanburg is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.

Demographics

Demographics Spartanburg vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spartanburg Fort valley
Black 45 70
White 44 18
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 8
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 45% in Spartanburg.
  • Spartanburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Spartanburg at 2% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Spartanburg.
  • Both Spartanburg and Fort valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spartanburg and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spartanburg Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 15.5%
Depression 22.9% 19.5%
Smoking 20.1% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 11.8%
Obesity 38.5% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.9% in Spartanburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spartanburg at 22.9% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 20.1% in Spartanburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Spartanburg at 13.8% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 38.5% in Spartanburg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Spartanburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spartanburg Fort valley
No Schooling 1.0% (384) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 15.9% (6,118) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 11.2% (4,339) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (8,205) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.0% in Spartanburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 11.2% in Spartanburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.