Demographics details for Spartanburg, SC vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spartanburg, SC vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Spartanburg | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,584 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,140 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fairhope
- In Spartanburg, the population is higher at 38,584, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
- Spartanburg has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Spartanburg is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Spartanburg vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spartanburg | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 4 |
| White | 44 | 89 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Spartanburg at 45% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 44% in Spartanburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Spartanburg at 2% compared to 1% in Fairhope.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Spartanburg at 5% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Spartanburg at 4% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spartanburg and Fairhope at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spartanburg | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fairhope
- More residents in Spartanburg report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Depression is more prevalent in Spartanburg at 22.9% compared to 22.6% in Fairhope.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Spartanburg at 20.1% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 13.8% in Spartanburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Spartanburg at 38.5% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- Disability percentages are higher in Spartanburg at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spartanburg | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (384) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,118) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (4,339) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (8,205) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spartanburg vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spartanburg hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- More residents in Spartanburg have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 21.3% in Spartanburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.