Demographics details for Sparks, NV vs Taylorsville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sparks, NV vs Taylorsville, NC.
Data | Sparks | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,226 | 2,298 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 53.7 years |
Median Income | $82,938 | $43,681 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sparks vs Taylorsville
- In Sparks, the population is higher at 109,226, compared to 2,298 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher median income of $82,938 compared to $43,681 in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sparks at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 12%, compared to 10% in Sparks.
- The unemployment rate in Sparks is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Sparks vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sparks | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 8 |
White | 43 | 86 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 34 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sparks vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Sparks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 86% compared to 43% in Sparks.
- The Asian population is larger in Sparks at 5% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sparks at 34% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sparks at 15% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sparks at 1% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sparks | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.4% |
Depression | 19.9% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sparks vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Sparks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 25.6% versus 19.9% in Sparks.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 17.0% in Sparks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sparks at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 28.6% in Sparks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Sparks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sparks | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,548) | 1.2% (27) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (16,026) | 26.1% (599) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (19,717) | 19.3% (444) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (18,457) | 11.0% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sparks vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sparks have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 14.7% in Sparks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 19.3%, compared to 18.1% in Sparks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sparks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.0% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.