Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Rockford, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Rockford, IL.

Data Spanish fork Rockford
Population 44,102 146,713
Median Age 27.4 years 37.5 years
Median Income $93,989 $50,744
Married Families 43.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 7.6

Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Rockford

  • The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
  • The median age in Rockford is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Spanish fork vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spanish fork Rockford
Black 1 22
White 80 46
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 12 19
Two or More Races 7 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Rockford

  • In Rockford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 46% in Rockford.
  • In Rockford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Spanish fork.
  • Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 9%, compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Rockford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spanish fork Rockford
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 13.9%
Depression 23.8% 21.0%
Smoking 7.7% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 8.3% 14.8%
Obesity 31.0% 44.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Rockford

  • In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 23.8% compared to 21.0% in Rockford.
  • Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 14.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Rockford has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spanish fork Rockford
No Schooling 0.4% (175) 1.2% (1,781)
High School Diploma 9.1% (4,010) 16.4% (24,126)
Less than High School 5.9% (2,583) 17.1% (25,088)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (8,546) 15.5% (22,792)

Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Rockford

  • In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
  • In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.5% in Rockford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.