Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Orange cove, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Orange cove, CA.

Data Spanish fork Orange cove
Population 44,102 9,525
Median Age 27.4 years 24.4 years
Median Income $93,989 $33,671
Married Families 43.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 6% 26%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.2

Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Orange cove

  • In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 9,525 in Orange cove.
  • Residents in Spanish fork have a higher median age of 27.4 years compared to 24.4 years in Orange cove.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $33,671 in Orange cove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Orange cove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Orange cove at 26%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Orange cove has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Spanish fork vs Orange cove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spanish fork Orange cove
Black 1 1
White 80 -17
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 12 97
Two or More Races 7 19
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Orange cove

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Orange cove at 1%.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to -17% in Orange cove.
  • Both Spanish fork and Orange cove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Orange cove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Orange cove at 19%, compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Orange cove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spanish fork Orange cove
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 20.7%
Depression 23.8% 19.2%
Smoking 7.7% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 8.3% 11.7%
Obesity 31.0% 46.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Orange cove

  • In Orange cove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 23.8% compared to 19.2% in Orange cove.
  • Orange cove has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Orange cove at 11.7% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Orange cove has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Orange cove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spanish fork Orange cove
No Schooling 0.4% (175) 6.5% (617)
High School Diploma 9.1% (4,010) 8.0% (765)
Less than High School 5.9% (2,583) 55.1% (5,248)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (8,546) 3.3% (315)

Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Orange cove

  • In Orange cove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.5% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a high school diploma at 9.1% compared to 8.0% in Orange cove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Orange cove at 55.1%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 3.3% in Orange cove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.