Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Newark, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Newark, OH.
| Data | Spanish fork | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,102 | 50,763 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $93,989 | $56,284 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 50,763, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- The median age in Newark is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $56,284 in Newark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 12%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Spanish fork vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spanish fork | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 80 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Newark
- In Newark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Newark at 88% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- In Newark, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Spanish fork at 12% compared to 3% in Newark.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Spanish fork at 7% compared to 5% in Newark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spanish fork | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 7.7% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newark at 26.0% versus 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Newark has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newark at 16.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Newark has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newark at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spanish fork | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (175) | 0.5% (258) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (4,010) | 21.6% (10,967) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (2,583) | 10.6% (5,370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (8,546) | 15.0% (7,627) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 10.6%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.