Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Crab orchard, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Crab orchard, KY.

Data Spanish fork Crab orchard
Population 44,102 743
Median Age 27.4 years 38.9 years
Median Income $93,989 $27,721
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 6% 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 6.1

Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crab orchard

  • In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 743 in Crab orchard.
  • The median age in Crab orchard is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $27,721 in Crab orchard.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Crab orchard.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crab orchard at 16%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Crab orchard has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Spanish fork vs Crab orchard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spanish fork Crab orchard
Black 1 1
White 80 89
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 12 7
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crab orchard

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Crab orchard at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crab orchard at 89% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
  • Both Spanish fork and Crab orchard have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Spanish fork at 12% compared to 7% in Crab orchard.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Spanish fork at 7% compared to 3% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Crab orchard at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spanish fork Crab orchard
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 22.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 18.3%
Depression 23.8% 32.5%
Smoking 7.7% 30.6%
Binge Drinking 8.3% 13.9%
Obesity 31.0% 42.0%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crab orchard

  • In Crab orchard, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crab orchard at 32.5% versus 23.8% in Spanish fork.
  • Crab orchard has a higher smoking rate at 30.6% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crab orchard at 13.9% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Crab orchard has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crab orchard at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spanish fork Crab orchard
No Schooling 0.4% (175) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 9.1% (4,010) 25.8% (192)
Less than High School 5.9% (2,583) 26.9% (200)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (8,546) 2.6% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crab orchard

  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
  • In Crab orchard, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crab orchard at 26.9%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 2.6% in Crab orchard.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.