Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Carlisle, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Carlisle, IN.
| Data | Spanish fork | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,102 | 618 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 52.6 years |
| Median Income | $93,989 | $49,250 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Carlisle
- In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- The median age in Carlisle is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- The poverty level is higher in Carlisle at 9%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Spanish fork is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Carlisle.
Demographics
Demographics Spanish fork vs Carlisle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spanish fork | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 80 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carlisle at 93% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Spanish fork and Carlisle have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Spanish fork at 12% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Spanish fork at 7% compared to 5% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Carlisle at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spanish fork | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 7.7% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carlisle at 27.0% versus 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Carlisle has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Carlisle has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carlisle at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spanish fork | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (175) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (4,010) | 28.8% (178) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (2,583) | 3.9% (24) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (8,546) | 6.0% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Carlisle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Spanish fork have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.