Demographics details for Southlake, TX vs Zumbro falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southlake, TX vs Zumbro falls, MN.
Data | Southlake | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,102 | 155 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $250,001 | $84,750 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Southlake vs Zumbro falls
- In Southlake, the population is higher at 31,102, compared to 155 in Zumbro falls.
- Residents in Southlake have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 36.6 years in Zumbro falls.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $84,750 in Zumbro falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southlake at 54.0% compared to 46.0% in Zumbro falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Southlake and Zumbro falls at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Southlake is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.5% in Zumbro falls.
Demographics
Demographics Southlake vs Zumbro falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Southlake | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 99 |
Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southlake vs Zumbro falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southlake at 1% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Zumbro falls at 99% compared to 68% in Southlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Southlake at 17% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southlake at 9% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southlake at 5% compared to 1% in Zumbro falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southlake and Zumbro falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Southlake | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 8.8% |
Depression | 21.3% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 8.4% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 21.7% |
Obesity | 27.1% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southlake vs Zumbro falls
- In Zumbro falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Zumbro falls at 23.3% versus 21.3% in Southlake.
- Zumbro falls has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Zumbro falls at 21.7% compared to 19.4% in Southlake.
- Zumbro falls has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southlake at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Zumbro falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Southlake | Zumbro falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (15) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 4.2% (1,302) | 17.4% (27) |
Less than High School | 1.3% (392) | 1.3% (2) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.0% (14,310) | 21.9% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southlake vs Zumbro falls
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Southlake and Zumbro falls at 0.0%.
- In Zumbro falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 1.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 21.9% in Zumbro falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.