Demographics details for Southlake, TX vs New windsor, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Southlake, TX vs New windsor, NY.

Data Southlake New windsor
Population 31,102 27,664
Median Age 42.3 years 41.0 years
Median Income $250,001 $80,000
Married Families 54.0% 62.1%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.1

Population Comparison: Southlake vs New windsor

  • In Southlake, the population is higher at 31,102, compared to 27,664 in New windsor.
  • Residents in Southlake have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 41.0 years in New windsor.
  • Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $80,000 in New windsor.
  • In New windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.1%, compared to 54.0% in Southlake.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Southlake and New windsor at 0%.
  • The unemployment rate in Southlake is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in New windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Southlake vs New windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Southlake New windsor
Black 1 5
White 68 80
Asian 17 5
Hispanic 9 10
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Southlake vs New windsor

  • In New windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Southlake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in New windsor at 80% compared to 68% in Southlake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Southlake at 17% compared to 5% in New windsor.
  • New windsor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Southlake.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Southlake at 5% compared to 0% in New windsor.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southlake and New windsor at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Southlake New windsor
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 7.2% Data is updating%
Depression 21.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 8.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 27.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 7.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Southlake vs New windsor

  • More residents in Southlake report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Southlake at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Southlake at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Southlake at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Southlake at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Southlake New windsor
No Schooling 0.0% (15) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 4.2% (1,302) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 1.3% (392) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 46.0% (14,310) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Southlake vs New windsor

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Southlake and New windsor at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a high school diploma at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • More residents in Southlake have less than a high school education at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.