Demographics details for Southlake, TX vs Muldraugh, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southlake, TX vs Muldraugh, KY.
| Data | Southlake | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,102 | 1,019 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $250,001 | $49,375 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Southlake vs Muldraugh
- In Southlake, the population is higher at 31,102, compared to 1,019 in Muldraugh.
- Residents in Southlake have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 39.6 years in Muldraugh.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $49,375 in Muldraugh.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southlake at 54.0% compared to 25.0% in Muldraugh.
- The poverty level is higher in Muldraugh at 15%, compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Southlake is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Muldraugh.
Demographics
Demographics Southlake vs Muldraugh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southlake | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 68 | 83 |
| Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southlake vs Muldraugh
- In Muldraugh, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Muldraugh at 83% compared to 68% in Southlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Southlake at 17% compared to 0% in Muldraugh.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Southlake and Muldraugh at 9%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southlake at 5% compared to 4% in Muldraugh.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southlake and Muldraugh at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southlake | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 30.2% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 27.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southlake vs Muldraugh
- In Muldraugh, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Muldraugh at 30.2% versus 21.3% in Southlake.
- Muldraugh has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Muldraugh.
- Muldraugh has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Muldraugh at 40.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southlake | Muldraugh |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (15) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.2% (1,302) | 36.4% (371) |
| Less than High School | 1.3% (392) | 13.7% (140) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.0% (14,310) | 5.1% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southlake vs Muldraugh
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Southlake and Muldraugh at 0.0%.
- In Muldraugh, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.4% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Muldraugh at 13.7%, compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 5.1% in Muldraugh.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.