Demographics details for Southlake, TX vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southlake, TX vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Southlake | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,102 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $250,001 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Southlake vs Meadville
- In Southlake, the population is higher at 31,102, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Southlake have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southlake at 54.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 0% in Southlake.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Southlake vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southlake | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 68 | 86 |
| Asian | 17 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southlake vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 68% in Southlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Southlake at 17% compared to 1% in Meadville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southlake at 9% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meadville at 6%, compared to 5% in Southlake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southlake and Meadville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southlake | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southlake vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 21.3% in Southlake.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southlake | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (15) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 4.2% (1,302) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 1.3% (392) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.0% (14,310) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southlake vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meadville at 8.6%, compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.