Demographics details for Southlake, TX vs Freeport, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southlake, TX vs Freeport, MN.
| Data | Southlake | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,102 | 677 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 29.9 years |
| Median Income | $250,001 | $91,250 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Southlake vs Freeport
- In Southlake, the population is higher at 31,102, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- Residents in Southlake have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $91,250 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southlake at 54.0% compared to 53.0% in Freeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Freeport at 5%, compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Southlake is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Southlake vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southlake | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 68 | 82 |
| Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southlake vs Freeport
- In Freeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeport at 82% compared to 68% in Southlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Southlake at 17% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southlake at 5% compared to 4% in Freeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southlake and Freeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southlake | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 23.3% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southlake vs Freeport
- In Freeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeport at 23.7% versus 21.3% in Southlake.
- Freeport has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 19.4% in Southlake.
- Freeport has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southlake at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southlake | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (15) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 4.2% (1,302) | 19.9% (135) |
| Less than High School | 1.3% (392) | 9.2% (62) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.0% (14,310) | 17.4% (118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southlake vs Freeport
- In Freeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- In Freeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeport at 9.2%, compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 17.4% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.