Demographics details for Southington, CT vs Piggott, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Southington, CT vs Piggott, AR.

Data Southington Piggott
Population 43,807 3,545
Median Age Data is updating 37.6 years
Median Income $Data is updating $43,255
Married Families Data is updating 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Southington vs Piggott

  • In Southington, the population is higher at 43,807, compared to 3,545 in Piggott.
  • The median age in Piggott is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 0.0 years in Southington.
  • Piggott has a higher median income of $43,255, compared to $0 in Southington.
  • In Piggott, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Piggott at 15%, compared to 0% in Southington.
  • Piggott has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Southington.

Demographics

Demographics Southington vs Piggott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Southington Piggott
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 96
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Southington vs Piggott

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Southington and Piggott at 0%.
  • Southington has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 96% in Piggott.
  • Both Southington and Piggott have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Piggott has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Piggott at 2%, compared to 0% in Southington.
  • In Piggott, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Southington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Southington Piggott
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.7%
Depression Data is updating% 29.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Southington vs Piggott

  • In Piggott, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Piggott at 29.5% versus 0.0% in Southington.
  • Piggott has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Piggott at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Piggott has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piggott at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Southington Piggott
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (14)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.0% (746)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.9% (423)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.7% (414)

Education Levels Comparison: Southington vs Piggott

  • In Piggott, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • In Piggott, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Piggott at 11.9%, compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • In Piggott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.