Demographics details for Southfield, MI vs Netawaka, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southfield, MI vs Netawaka, KS.
Data | Southfield | Netawaka |
---|---|---|
Population | 75,431 | 139 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $63,980 | $70,417 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Southfield vs Netawaka
- In Southfield, the population is higher at 75,431, compared to 139 in Netawaka.
- The median age in Netawaka is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 42.1 years in Southfield.
- Netawaka has a higher median income of $70,417, compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
- In Netawaka, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- Southfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Netawaka.
- The unemployment rate in Southfield is higher at 6.2%, compared to 2.5% in Netawaka.
Demographics
Demographics Southfield vs Netawaka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Southfield | Netawaka |
---|---|---|
Black | 66 | Data is updating |
White | 23 | 89 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Southfield vs Netawaka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southfield at 66% compared to 0% in Netawaka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Netawaka at 89% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Southfield at 2% compared to 1% in Netawaka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southfield at 2% compared to 1% in Netawaka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southfield at 7% compared to 6% in Netawaka.
- In Netawaka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Southfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Southfield | Netawaka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.7% |
Depression | 17.6% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southfield vs Netawaka
- In Netawaka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Southfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Netawaka at 22.6% versus 17.6% in Southfield.
- Netawaka has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Netawaka at 19.4% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Netawaka has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 38.1% in Southfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Netawaka at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Southfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Southfield | Netawaka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (870) | 1.4% (2) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (9,038) | 22.3% (31) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (4,623) | 3.6% (5) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (20,760) | 10.8% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southfield vs Netawaka
- In Netawaka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Southfield.
- In Netawaka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- More residents in Southfield have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.6% in Netawaka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 10.8% in Netawaka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.