Demographics details for Southfield, MI vs Hankinson, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southfield, MI vs Hankinson, ND.
| Data | Southfield | Hankinson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,431 | 919 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $63,980 | $57,031 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Southfield vs Hankinson
- In Southfield, the population is higher at 75,431, compared to 919 in Hankinson.
- Residents in Southfield have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 39.7 years in Hankinson.
- Southfield has a higher median income of $63,980 compared to $57,031 in Hankinson.
- In Hankinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- Southfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Hankinson.
- The unemployment rate in Southfield is higher at 6.2%, compared to 2.5% in Hankinson.
Demographics
Demographics Southfield vs Hankinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southfield | Hankinson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Southfield vs Hankinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southfield at 66% compared to 1% in Hankinson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hankinson at 96% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Southfield at 2% compared to 0% in Hankinson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southfield at 2% compared to 0% in Hankinson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southfield at 7% compared to 1% in Hankinson.
- In Hankinson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Southfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southfield | Hankinson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 23.6% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southfield vs Hankinson
- More residents in Southfield report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.7% in Hankinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hankinson at 19.9% versus 17.6% in Southfield.
- Hankinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hankinson at 23.6% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Hankinson has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 38.1% in Southfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Hankinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southfield | Hankinson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (870) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (9,038) | 16.6% (153) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (4,623) | 11.1% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (20,760) | 14.0% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southfield vs Hankinson
- A higher percentage of residents in Southfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Hankinson.
- In Hankinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hankinson at 11.1%, compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 14.0% in Hankinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.