Demographics details for Southfield, MI vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southfield, MI vs Concord, CA.
| Data | Southfield | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,431 | 122,625 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,980 | $107,789 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Southfield vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 75,431 in Southfield.
- Residents in Southfield have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 38.8 years in Concord.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- Southfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Southfield is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.4% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Southfield vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southfield | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 4 |
| White | 23 | 33 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Southfield vs Concord
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southfield at 66% compared to 4% in Concord.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Concord at 33% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Southfield.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 2% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 16%, compared to 7% in Southfield.
- In Concord, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Southfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southfield | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southfield vs Concord
- More residents in Southfield report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Concord at 17.8% versus 17.6% in Southfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Southfield at 14.8% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.0% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Southfield at 38.1% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southfield | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (870) | 1.8% (2,147) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (9,038) | 13.0% (15,969) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (4,623) | 15.7% (19,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (20,760) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southfield vs Concord
- In Concord, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Southfield.
- In Concord, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Concord at 15.7%, compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 27.1% in Concord.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.