Demographics details for Southfield, MI vs Aiken, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southfield, MI vs Aiken, SC.
Data | Southfield | Aiken |
---|---|---|
Population | 75,431 | 32,463 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 46.4 years |
Median Income | $63,980 | $65,712 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Southfield vs Aiken
- In Southfield, the population is higher at 75,431, compared to 32,463 in Aiken.
- The median age in Aiken is higher at 46.4 years, compared to 42.1 years in Southfield.
- Aiken has a higher median income of $65,712, compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
- In Aiken, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- Southfield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Aiken.
- The unemployment rate in Southfield is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.2% in Aiken.
Demographics
Demographics Southfield vs Aiken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Southfield | Aiken |
---|---|---|
Black | 66 | 36 |
White | 23 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southfield vs Aiken
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southfield at 66% compared to 36% in Aiken.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aiken at 56% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- Both Southfield and Aiken have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Aiken has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Southfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southfield at 7% compared to 3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southfield and Aiken at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Southfield | Aiken |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.0% |
Depression | 17.6% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southfield vs Aiken
- In Aiken, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.4% in Southfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aiken at 20.3% versus 17.6% in Southfield.
- Aiken has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Aiken at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Southfield at 38.1% compared to 35.7% in Aiken.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Aiken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Southfield | Aiken |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (870) | 0.5% (150) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (9,038) | 14.3% (4,646) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (4,623) | 7.3% (2,369) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (20,760) | 30.6% (9,923) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southfield vs Aiken
- A higher percentage of residents in Southfield have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Aiken.
- In Aiken, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aiken at 7.3%, compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
- In Aiken, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 27.5% in Southfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.