Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Roanoke rapids, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Roanoke rapids, NC.

Data Southaven Roanoke rapids
Population 56,360 14,856
Median Age 35.4 years 40.5 years
Median Income $72,513 $45,732
Married Families 37.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.8

Population Comparison: Southaven vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 14,856 in Roanoke rapids.
  • The median age in Roanoke rapids is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
  • Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roanoke rapids at 18%, compared to 12% in Southaven.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.

Demographics

Demographics Southaven vs Roanoke rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Southaven Roanoke rapids
Black 35 35
White 55 50
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Roanoke rapids

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Southaven and Roanoke rapids at 35%.
  • Southaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Both Southaven and Roanoke rapids have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Southaven.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roanoke rapids at 7%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Southaven.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Southaven Roanoke rapids
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 13.6%
Depression 22.9% 24.6%
Smoking 16.7% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 15.1%
Obesity 39.7% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Roanoke rapids at 15.1% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Southaven at 39.7% compared to 39.1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Southaven Roanoke rapids
No Schooling 1.2% (658) 0.6% (93)
High School Diploma 15.8% (8,925) 20.5% (3,040)
Less than High School 8.7% (4,879) 14.5% (2,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (9,035) 15.7% (2,326)

Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Roanoke rapids

  • A higher percentage of residents in Southaven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roanoke rapids at 14.5%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Roanoke rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.