Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Southaven | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Mccurtain
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 30,931 in Mccurtain.
- The median age in Mccurtain is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Southaven and Mccurtain at 37.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Southaven and Mccurtain at 12%.
- Mccurtain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 8 |
| White | 55 | 58 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southaven at 35% compared to 8% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- Both Southaven and Mccurtain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Mccurtain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Southaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 39.7% in Southaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.