Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Lanett, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Lanett, AL.
| Data | Southaven | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 6,759 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Lanett
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- The median age in Lanett is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- Southaven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Southaven and Lanett at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Lanett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 73 |
| White | 55 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Lanett
- In Lanett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 35% in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- The Asian population is larger in Southaven at 1% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- Lanett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Southaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southaven at 4% compared to 3% in Lanett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southaven and Lanett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Southaven at 22.9% compared to 22.1% in Lanett.
- Lanett has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Lanett has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 39.7% in Southaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 1.3% (90) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 18.9% (1,277) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 20.3% (1,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 7.4% (498) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
- In Lanett, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lanett at 20.3%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.